For two years corrupt media outlets pushed the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion story non-stop. And finally, the Mueller investigation summary report confirmed there was no collusion.
This $25 million dollar investigation proves what Trump said from the beginning that this was the biggest witch hunt in the history of America.
The no collusion conclusion also reinforces another point Trump emphasized over and over, that the “Fake News Media is the Enemy of the People”.
Media outlets like CNN, Buzzfeed, The New York Times, Washington Post, and MSNBC, who pushed the Russia collusion narrative for the past two years should have no credibility left.
A lot of people are probably asking themselves how could these media outlets be so corrupt? How could they push a story for two years that had no evidence? Have these media outlets always been this way and only now they finally met their match with Trump?
The media is one of the most powerful forces in forming our thoughts and opinions. What other stories have they been telling us that were complete fabrications?
This skepticism towards the corrupt media is now reaching The Pulitzer Prize. The once prestigious journalism award for the industry’s best work is being questions about the validity of a 2018 prize awarded to The New York Times and The Washington Post.
With Mueller’s no evidence of collusion report does The New York Times and The Washington Post lose the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for their Russia Interference coverage?
As Newt Gingrich pointed out on Twitter, other papers have had to return the Pulitzer Prize for false reporting in the past.
The Pulitzer Prize represents an extension of corrupt fake news media, handing out awards to the highest bidder.
It’s time for a new prize for outstanding journalism. One judged in an open and transparent way.